DOI: https://doi.org/10.25043/19098642.80
Cover Image

Application of Operational Effectiveness Models in Naval Ship concept exploration and design

Alan J. Brown

Abstract


Traditionally, the Concept and Requirements Exploration process is the first stage of ship design. Concept and Requirements Exploration responds to a stated mission need with early high-level assessment of a broad range of ship design options and technologies. Our design group uses a Multi-Objective Optimization approach to explore the design space and identify non-dominated designs ranked by cost, risk, and effectiveness. Our method of calculating effectiveness in this approach has, in the past, been based on expert opinion. In this study, the use of a more direct physics-based Operational Effectiveness Model approach is considered to provide greater confidence in the validity of effectiveness results and a perception that results are more unbiased and rational. This approach requires significant early investment. How much analysis is enough and is there significant payoff for this significant effort? This paper presents this approach and explores these questions.


Keywords


ship design; operational effectiveness models; systems engineering

Full Text:

PDF HTML

References


ANDREWS, DAVID, “Requirements Elucidation as the Task of initial Naval Ship Design”, AVTET-132 Presentation, December 2012.

BELTON, V., “A comparison of the analytic hierarchy process and a simple multi-attribute value function”, European Journal of Operational Research, 1986.

BROWN, A.J., THOMAS, M., "Reengineering the Naval Ship Concept Design Process", From Research to Reality in Ship Systems Engineering Symposium, ASNE, 1998.

BROWN, A.J., SALCEDO, J., "Multiple Objective Genetic Optimization In Naval Ship Design", Naval Engineers Journal, Vol. 115, No. 4, pp. 49-61, 2003.

BROWN, A.J., “Multi-Objective Optimization in Naval Ship Concept Design”, Marine Systems and Technology (MAST) 2010 Conference, Rome, Italy, 9-11 November, 2010.

BUEDE, DENNIS, “A Primer for Model-Based Systems Engineering”, Vitech Corporation, February, 2011.

DEMKO, D., “Tools for Multi-Objective and Multi-Disciplinary Optimization in Naval Ship Design”, MS Thesis, Virginia Tech, May 2005.

DoD, DoD 5000.01, 12 May 2003, “The Defense Acquisition System”

DoD, DoDI 5000.02, 2 December 2008, “Operation of the Defense Acquisition System”

DoD, DoDAF 2.0, DoD Architecture Framework, Version 2.02, http://cio-nii.defense.gov/sites/dodaf20/index.html, 2011.

FOX, JASON, “A Capability-Based, Meta-Model Approach to Combatant Ship Design”, MS Thesis, NPS, May 2011.

GOMEZ-TORRES, JOSE, M., “Warship Combat Systems Selection Methodology Based on Discrete

Event Simulation", Master’s Thesis, NPS, 2010.

JONS, OTTO, “Operator and Designer Interaction in the Early Acquisition Phase”, AVT-ET-132 Presentation, December 2012.

KERNS, COREY M., “Naval Ship Design and Synthesis Model Architecture Using a Model-Based Systems Engineering Approach”, Master’s Thesis, Virginia Tech, May 2011.

MIERZWICKI, T., BROWN, A.J. (2004), “Risk Metric for Multi-Objective Design of Naval Ships”, Naval Engineers Journal, Vol. 116, No. 2, pp. 55-71.Phoenix Integration, Model Center, Version 10, 2012.

Naval Warfare Development Command (NWDC), “Naval Mission Essential Task List (NMETL) Development Handbook,” June 2000.

SAATY, T.L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, 1996.

SHAHAK, SHMUEL, “Naval Ship Concept Design: an Evolutionary Approach”, MS Thesis, Department of Ocean Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1998.

SKOLNICK, FRED AND WILKINS, “Laying the Foundation for Successful Systems Engineering”, Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest, Volume 21, Number 2, 2000.

STROCK, J., BROWN, A.J., “Methods for Naval Ship Concept and Propulsion System Technology Exploration in a CGX Case Study”, Naval Engineers Journal, Vol. 120, No. 4, pp. 95-122, 2008.

STEPANCHICK, J., BROWN, A.J., “Revisiting DDGX/DDG-51 Concept Exploration”, Naval

Engineers Journal, Vol. 119, No. 3, 67-88, 2007.

VITECH CORPORATION, “CORE DoDAF 2.0 Architecture Definition Guide”, August, 2010.

VITECH – CORE 7 Software, 2011


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM




Copyright (c) 2013 Ciencia y tecnología de buques

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ISSN: 1909-8642 (Impreso)

ISSN: 2619-645X (Online) 

https://doi.org/10.25043/issn.1909-8642

Revista en OJS implementada por Biteca Ltda.